Davy Sum vs Miliaan Niesten Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sum vs Niesten analysis and find out who is favored!
Davy Sum vs Miliaan Niesten Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sum 0 - 0 Niesten
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sum has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Niesten has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sum, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Niesten has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sum has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niesten has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sum has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Niesten winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sum has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 17/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 16/ 21). Niesten has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 140/ 83), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 16/ 17).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sum has played against opponents with an average rank of while Niesten has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sum has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niesten has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sum has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niesten has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
585
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
431
High
36
Age
L
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
50% (55-54)
Career Total W/L
58% (229-166)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,790
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Davy Sum vs Miliaan Niesten For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sum VS Niesten
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Davy Sum | Miliaan Niesten |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Davy Sum Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Davy Sum
Player
Lucas Bouquet
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Davy Sum
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Miliaan Niesten Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Cameron Norrie
Player
Miliaan Niesten
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
81%
(
30 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yannick Maden
Player
Miliaan Niesten
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Miliaan Niesten
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Miliaan Niesten
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Yunseong Chung
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Makoto Ochi
Player
Miliaan Niesten
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Lucas Gerch
Player
Miliaan Niesten
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Dhruv Sunish
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Miliaan Niesten
41%
(
33 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Miliaan Niesten
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Sum Vs Niesten Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sum are available here and Niesten photos here.